Notable Historical Mineralized Drill Intercepts at Goodrich

(via TheNewswire)   Vancouver, BC, Canada – Monday, October 5, 2026 – TheNewswire - Great Plains Metals Corp. ("GPS" or "the Company", TSX-V: GPS, Frankfurt Exchange: 8VC) is pleased to announce the Notable Historical Mineralized Intercepts at the Goodrich copper-gold project in New South Wales, Australia, following an extensive review of historical drilling records located in the NSW Resources archives.   Furthermore, this has proven invaluable in identifying the drill targets for the upcoming fully funded Stage 2 drill program that is scheduled to commence later this month.  The Company will provide further information on the upcoming drill program in due course.   Key Highlights:   A review of over 5,000 meters of Goodrich drill records in the archives at NSW Resources revealed that several holes from drill programs completed in the 1980s encountered significant porphyry-related copper-gold mineralization.     Diamond drill hole KB1 1 intersected 50.08 meters of 0.41% Cu and 0.32g/t Au     Diamond drill hole DDHG10 intersected 37 meters of 0.55% Cu and 0.17g/t Au     Percussion drill hole YG08 intersected 33 meters of 0.65% Cu and 1.43 g/t Au     Shallow Mineralization Identified at Surface: Multiple shallow percussion holes in the YG series starting from just 1 meter deep, highlighted by 23 meters of 0.52% Cu and 0.73 g/t Au (YG07) and 15 meters of 0.33% Cu and 0.84 g/t Au (YG19) at the northern margin of the historic workings.     The Company was able to review data from over 5,000 meters across 46 drill holes completed at Goodrich since 1980.  The key historical drill intercepts have been mapped (Figure 1) and the notable drill intercepts displayed in Table 1 below.   This newly acquired data builds upon the completed Stage 1 drill program, in particular, drillhole GGDD004 that verified a continuous, 128-meter intercept of porphyry-style mineralization of 128 meters of 0.34% copper and 0.17 g/t gold.   Table 1: Notable Historical Mineralized Drill Intercepts   Drill Hole ID From (m) Interval (m)* Copper (% Cu) Gold (g/t) KB1 26m 50.08m 0.41% 0.32 g/t including 26m 7.2m 0.77% 0.79 g/t including 84.5m 11.5m 0.82% 0.39 g/t DDHG10 87.3m 10m 0.82% 0.11 g/t DDHG10 119m 37m 0.55% 0.17 g/t YG08 1m 33m 0.65% 1.43 g/t including 14m 15m 1.09% 3.09 g/t YG07 1m 23m 0.52% 0.73 g/t YG19 1m 15m 0.33% 0.84 g/t GGDD001 (including) 152m 9m 0.72% 0.71 g/t GGDD002A 131m 6m 0.32% 0.36 g/t GM002 112m 12m 0.54% 0.33 g/t GM002 144m 12m 0.31% 0.24 g/t GRDD01 146m 48m 0.33% 0.23 g/t GRDD03 131m 19m 0.47% 0.15 g/t * Drill intercepts are reported as net mineralized downhole lengths where post-mineral barren dykes have been geometrically subtracted. Click Image To View Full Size Figure 1.  Historical Mineralized Drill Intercepts   These legacy drill results from decades ago, further indicate that significant gold-copper mineralization is present in the Goodrich district. Fortunately, the original core, photos and assays are well preserved at the W.B. Clarke Geoscience Centre, Londonderry Drillcore Library in New South Wales and a review of this data confirmed that several Unidirectional Solidification Textures (UST) zones, a diagnostic indicator of the upper contact of a mineralized porphyry intrusion , are associated with near surface mineralized porphyry cupolas. The forthcoming drilling program is designed to test the geological relationship which will enable subsequent deeper drilling.   It was also observed from the photographic record of the core that significant intervals of hydro-thermally altered monzonite porphyry were not assayed. GPS has recently completed a sampling program and a total of 94 one meter half core slices from historic holes KB1 and DDHG10 have been submitted for assay.   Drillhole KB1   Click Image To View Full Size Figure 2.  Historical Drillhole KB1 Mineralized I ntersection   Drill hole KB1 (Geopeko Ltd, 1980) drilled in a southeast direction away from the historic mine workings, intersected several intervals of altered and mineralized monzonite porphyry as highlighted in Figure 2. Importantly, an unrecognized UST zone from 26 to 33 meters assayed 0.77% Cu and 0.79g/t Au, indicating the upper contact of a highly mineralized cupola.   Drillhole DDHG10   Click Image To View Full Size   Figure 3.  Historical Drillhole DDHG10 Mineralized Intersection   Drill hole DDHG10 (Kevin Barker, 1985) was collared to the east of the old mine and drilled back towards the workings in a north northwest direction. A thick mineralized UST zone was intersected from 87 to 103 meters with only partial historical assays that are shown in Figure 3. For unknown reasons only limited selected sampling of this hole was carried out, despite the obvious presence of altered and mineralized monzonite porphyry. Sampling was conducted from 119 to 156 meters which averaged 0.55% Cu and 0.17g/t Au.   Drillhole YG08   Click Image To View Full Size Figure 4.  Historical Drillhole YG08 Mineralized Intersection Percussion drill hole YG08 (Lynch Mining, 1988) was collared at the northern margin of the mine workings and was drilled to a depth of 51 meters. The 33 meter interval from 1 meter assayed 0.65% Cu and 1.43 g/t Au, which was described as altered and silicified granite with sulfides.   Importantly, YG08 is supported by several other notable shallow holes in the immediate vicinity within the YG series. This includes hole YG07, which intersected 23 meters of 0.52% Cu and 0.73 g/t Au from 1 meter, and hole YG19, which returned 15 meters of 0.33% Cu and 0.84 g/t Au from 1 meter, collectively suggesting a robust blanket of near-surface gold-copper mineralization.   The full results from all the historical drill holes that were evaluated is shown below in Table 2 with supporting drill collar information in Table 3.   Peeyush Varshney, CEO, commented:   “Today's  news release highlights a pivotal milestone for GPS as we technically validate the historical foundation of our flagship Goodrich project. Decades ago, when initial drilling programs were conducted in 1980s and throughout the late 1990s, the economic reality of the copper market was vastly different. In those price environments, the robust intervals encountered, such as  50.08 meters of 0.41% copper and 0.32 g/t gold  in hole KB1, were routinely overlooked as exploration priorities shifted during periods of depressed commodity prices.     Today, the global landscape has completely transformed. Driven by electrification, AI infrastructure and the green energy transition, the mining industry is facing a severe reality of depleting high-grade resources. According to industry data from  Mining Intelligence , the averag e copper grade for producing mines worldwide has fallen to approximately 0.53% [1] , while the average grade for upcoming projects in development has dropped even lower to just  0.39% [2].   Additionally, the historical data from the shallow YG series provides important structural context for the upper zones of the deposit. Encountering near-surface mineralization starting from 1 meter deep, highlighted by the main intercept of 33 meters of 0.65% copper and 1.43 g/t gold in hole YG08 , which includes a higher-grade core of 15 meters of 1.09% copper and 3.09 g/t gold from 14 meters, indicates that copper-gold mineralization extends to the surface at the northern margin of the historical workings.   Furthermore, within the porphyry system that has been recognized at Goodrich, looking at the copper grade in isolation only tells half the story. The associated gold content is also a key economic driver and can transform project economics.   Against this backdrop, data we have unlocked from the NSW Resources archives with mineralized intercepts that were ignored forty years ago provide further evidence that a robust porphyry system exists beneath the old Goodrich Mine workings."   Table 2: Full Historical Drill Hole Results   Drill Hole ID From (m) Interval (m)* Copper (% Cu) Gold (g/t) Comments DDHG3         Not assayed DDHG4 30.49m 15.30m 0.1% 0.32 g/t   DDHG5         No significant intercept DDHG6         Not assayed.  No mineralization. DDHG7         Not assayed.  No mineralization. DDHG10 87.3m 10m 0.82% 0.11 g/t Partial assays: 5.7 meters missing assays DDHG10 119m 37m 0.55% 0.17 g/t   GGDD001 152m 86.80m 0.14% 0.16 g/t 91m downhole less 4.2m dyke including 152m 9m 0.72% 0.71 g/t   including 216m 13.8m 0.27% 0.39 g/t 17m downhole less 3.2m dyke GGDD002         Abandoned at 16.2m. Not assayed. GGDD002A 57.86m 77.43m 0.1% 0.13 g/t 79.14m downhole less 1.71m dyke including 79m 7m 0.21% 0.32 g/t   including 131m 6m 0.32% 0.36 g/t   GM001         No significant intercept. GM002 88m 84m 0.2% 0.13 g/t   including 112m 12m 0.54% 0.33 g/t   including 144m 12m 0.31% 0.24 g/t   GRDD01 146m 48m 0.33% 0.23 g/t 57m downhole less 9m dyke including 158m 4m 0.31% 0.24 g/t   including 166m 28m 0.47% 0.33 g/t 37m downhole less 9m dyke GRDD02 125m 6m 0.35% 0.17 g/t   GRDD03 74m 15m 0.2%   16m downhole less 1m dyke GRDD03 109m 6m 0.21%     GRDD03 131m 19m 0.47% 0.15 g/t 22m downhole less 3m dyke GRDD03 202m 6m 0.15% 0.13 g/t   GRDD03 247m 2m 0.34% 0.3 g/t   GRDD04         No significant intercept GRDD05         No significant intercept GRDD06 121m 7m 0.22% 0.08 g/t   GRDD06 158m 3m 0.44% 0.08 g/t   GRDD07         No significant intercept GRCC01         No significant intercept GRCC02         No significant intercept GRCC03 117m 27m 0.15% 0.21 g/t   GRCC04         No significant intercept GRCC05         No significant intercept GRCC06         No significant intercept GRCC08         Not assayed. GRCC09         Not assayed. GRCC10         Not assayed. GZ01         No mineralization. Not assayed. KB1 26m 50.08m 0.41% 0.32 g/t 70m downhole less 19.92m dyke including 26m 7.2m 0.77% 0.79 g/t   including 84.5m 11.5m 0.82% 0.39 g/t   KB1 142.5m 3.5m 0.26% 0.11 g/t   YG01 14m 6.5m 0.56% 0.22 g/t   YG03 1m 4m 0.33% 0.03 g/t   YG04         No significant intercept YG05         No significant intercept YG06         No significant intercept YG07 1m 23m 0.52% 0.73g/t   YG08 1m 33m 0.65% 1.43 g/t   including 14m 15m 1.09% 3.09 g/t   YG09 1m 17.5m 0.39% 0.47 g/t   YG12         No significant intercept YG13         No significant intercept YG14         No significant intercept YG15         No significant intercept YG16         No significant intercept YG17         No significant intercept YG18         No significant intercept YG19 1m 15m 0.33% 0.84 g/t   YG20 81m 9m 0.4% 0.04 g/t 10m downhole less 1m dyke * Drill intercepts are reported as net mineralized downhole lengths where post-mineral barren dykes have been geometrically subtracted.   Table 3: Drill Hole Collar Information   Drill Hole ID Easting Northing Elevation (m) Azimuth (°) Dip (°) Total Depth (m) GGDD001 648,565 6,373,014 459 235 -55 335.96 GGDD002 648,526 6,372,848 453 335 -55 16.2 GGDD002A 648,527 6,372,845 453 335 -55 282.6 GZ01 648,199 6,372,700 438 180 -60 240 GM001 648,460 6,372,855 448 157 -60 154 GM002 648,432 6,372,926 450 194 -84 208 GRCC08 648,253 6,372,824 437 218 -60 96 GRCC09 648,713 6,372,694 448 180 -60 54 GRCC10 648,793 6,373,124 463 180 -60 78 GRDD05 648,428 6,373,127 456 180 -57 300.2 GRDD06 648,513 6,373,053 460 180 -53 162 GRDD07 648,388 6,373,099 455 180 -54 336.75 GRDD01 648,428 6,373,031 458 168 -60 209.8 GRDD02 648,471 6,373,015 458 213 -60 143.8 GRDD03 648,470 6,373,011 458 168 -55 254.60 GRDD04 648,347 6,372,939 454 179 -70 221.90 GRCC01 648,493 6,373,059 460 270 -60 100 GRCC02 648,443 6,373,059 459 270 -55 100 GRCC03 648,431 6,372,945 457 179 -65 150 GRCC04 648,812 6,372,984 460 270 -60 54 GRCC05 648,652 6,372,784 450 270 -50 100 GRCC06 648,493 6,372,834 452 270 -55 95 YG20 648,372 6,373,005 448 156 -68 111 YG01 648,428 6,372,946 450 12 -60 20.5 YG03 648,405 6,372,972 450 192 -60 30 YG04 648,453 6,372,961 451 192 -60 18 YG05 648,465 6,372,984 453 247 -60 25 YG06 648,453 6,372,979 452 247 -60 19.5 YG07 648,442 6,373,000 452 192 -60 24 YG08 648,419 6,372,996 451 159 -60 51 YG09 648,408 6,372,983 450 129 -60 18.5 YG12 648,520 6,372,946 454 192 -60 25 YG13 648,520 6,372,938 454 192 -60 35 YG14 648,474 6,372,896 450 327 -60 24 YG15 648,484 6,372,903 451 237 -60 25 YG16 648,486 6,372,904 451 158 -60 25 YG17 648,547 6,372,888 453 237 -60 25 YG18 648,451 6,372,952 451 192 -60 25 YG19 648,449 6,372,977 452 257 -60 16 DDHG10 648,531 6,372,967 455 282 -50 195 DDHG6 647,943 6,373,260 441 missing -60 39 DDHG7 647,944 6,373,265 441 missing -60 39 DDHG3 648,535 6,372,943 455 missing missing 65 DDHG4 648,560 6,372,881 453 282 -60 200.4 DDHG5 647,673 6,373,024 426 2 -60 110.4 KB1 648,489 6,372,961 453 140 -60 152 Coordinate datum/projection: GDA94 MGA Zone 55   Quality Control & Quality Assurance   Historical drill results reported in Table 2 and Table 3 were sourced from the archives held by NSW Resources, a division of the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD). These legacy results span multiple generations of exploration campaigns conducted at the Goodrich Project by separate operators prior to the adoption of current industry-standard QA/QC protocols.   To ensure transparent verification under modern reporting frameworks, the 43 historical holes evaluated from the public database are grouped into the following historical campaigns:   The Geopeko Ltd Campaign (1980): Includes diamond drill hole KB1. No laboratory assay certificate or explicit analytical methodologies have survived in the public archive for this specific hole.   The Kevin Barker Lynch Mining Campaigns (1984–1990): Includes the DDHG series (DDHG3, DDHG4, DDHG5, DDHG6, DDHG7, DDHG10) and the YG percussion series (YG01, YG03 through YG09, and YG12 through YG20). Verified copies of original laboratory certificates were recovered and reviewed for holes DDHG10 (assayed at ALS Orange via methods Au-PM209 and G001) and for all YG holes. The 1988 holes (YG01 through YG19) were assayed at Australian Assay Laboratories Group via methods D610 and D100, and YG20 was assayed at ALS Orange via methods PM203 and G001. Data for the remaining DDHG holes are derived from historical compilation logs and have unverified certificate lineages.   The Malachite Resources NL Campaigns (1998-2002): Includes the GRDD diamond series (GRDD01 through GRDD07) and the GRRC reverse circulation series (GRRC01 through GRRC06, and GRRC08 through GRRC10). Original lab certificates for these programs were not located; however, historical data logs note that samples from all assayed holes were processed by ALS utilizing Au-PM209 and ME-IC581 methods. GRRC08 through GRRC10, drilled in 2002, were not assayed.   The Augur Resources Ltd Campaign (2010): Includes reverse circulation holes GM001 and GM002 which were assayed by ALS via methods Au-AA26 and ME-ICP41. Standalone certificates for these holes are currently missing, however, job tracking numbers are verified via archive summaries.   The Zodiac Resources Pty Ltd Campaign (2012): Includes reverse circulation hole GZ01, drilled under a farm-in agreement with Augur Resources Ltd. GZ01 was not assayed due to a lack of observed mineralization.     In addition, the Godolphin Resources Ltd Campaign (2023) includes diamond drill holes GGDD001, GGDD002, and GGDD002A. GGDD002 was abandoned at 16.2m and not assayed. Original laboratory certificates were obtained and reviewed for holes GGDD001 and GGDD002A, prepared at ALS Orange and assayed at ALS Perth via methods Au-ICP21, ME-MS61, and Cu-OG62. Certified reference materials and blanks were inserted at approximately one in every 20 samples.   Qualified Person Statement Mr. Douglas Kirwin, an executive Director of Great Plains Metals Corp and a non-independent Qualified Person (QP) as defined by National Instrument 43-101, has comprehensively reviewed the historical compilations, geological logs, available laboratory certificates, and drill core photographs available within the state database. Mr. Kirwin cautions that the historical results have not been independently validated to modern standards and should not be relied upon as confirmed resource grades. Data verification is currently being conducted by the Company through the confirmatory resampling program described below.   They are, however, considered a reasonable and reliable basis for exploration targeting.   To independently validate these legacy records and rectify gaps in the historical assay streams, the Company has undertaken a confirmatory resampling program of drill core archived at the W.B. Clarke Geoscience Centre, Londonderry Drillcore Library. A total of 94 half-core samples across key intervals in KB1 and DDHG10 have been submitted to Australian Laboratory Services Pty. Ltd. in Orange, NSW, which is independent of the Company and accredited to NATA standards for analysis via fire assay with AAS finish   for gold and four-acid ICP-AES for multi-element suites.   About Great Plains Metals Corp   Great Plains Metals Corp is an emerging, Australia-focused exploration company targeting copper-gold porphyry and district-scale critical mineral discoveries. The Company’s fast-track discovery strategy centers on technically validating high-grade, drill-ready targets situated within premier geological jurisdictions.   The Flagship Goodrich Project (NSW): Located in the heart of New South Wales' premier copper-gold jurisdiction – near the Yeoval township and roughly 70 km northwest of Orange – the project spans an extensive 290 km² across exploration licenses EL9243 and EL8538.  The Goodrich Project is situated within the world-class Lachlan Fold Belt.     Proven Mineral Footprint: Historically the largest mine in the Yeoval district, Goodrich operated intermittently between 1868 and 1912. Production from its historic 46 meter open pit and 90 meter underground shafts yielded an estimated ~300 tonnes of copper, 159 kg of gold, and 62 kg of silver, notably supporting a local smelter facility during its peak operational phases. Modern geological modeling suggests this historical mining merely exposed the upper tip of a significantly larger, robust porphyry core system below the old mine.   Strategic District-Scale Upside: GPS holds a 37.1% equity stake in Eversley Resources, giving the Company low-cost exposure to the Eversley North Gawler Craton Project in South Australia. Spanning an extensive 2,584 km² within the prolific Olympic Dam IOCG province, the project targets shallow, high-intensity Iron Oxide Copper-Gold (IOCG) systems alongside a near-surface Ionic Clay Rare Earth Element (REE) prospect. With a Native Title Mining Agreement for Exploration secured and target depths uniquely shallow at under 150 meters, the project represents immediate, high-value asset diversification.     Corporate Information & Contacts   Contact: Peeyush Varshney, CEO   Email/Investor Relations: [email protected]   Phone: (604) 684-2181   Official Website: greatplainsmetals.com   Social: linkedin.com/company/great-plains-metals-corp | X: @GPSMetals     References / Sources   [1] McCrae, M. A. (2018). Early stage copper projects have grades one-third below operating mines . MINING.COM / Mining Intelligence. Available online via MINING.COM.   [2] Stockhead Resources. (2022). EXPLAINER: How drilling results make the grade — Copper and Zinc . Stockhead Market Analysis.  Available online via Stockhead.   Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements   This news release contains certain statements that may be deemed “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “intends”, “estimates”, “projects”, “potential” and similar expressions, or that events or conditions “will”, “would”, “may”, “could” or “should” occur. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or realities may differ materially from those in forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.   Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release. 1  No laboratory assay certificate or stated analytical method has been located for KB1; see Quality Control & Quality Assurance. Copyright (c) 2026 TheNewswire - All rights reserved.