Selkirk Copper Announces Positive PEA for the Minto Project, Delivering After-Tax NPV of C$494M with 48% IRR

2026 Minto Project Preliminary Economic Assessment Highlights Target Mine Life, Mill Throughput, and Robust Economics Across Commodity Price Scenarios 13 year mine life at 4,100 tonnes per day ("tpd") mining-milling rate that produces peak 27,200 t copper-equivalent1 contained in concentrate or 48,700 t of high-grade copper-gold-silver concentrate at peak production NPV7% of C$494M, 47.8% internal rate of return ("IRR"), and 1.9 year after-tax payback from first production at US$5.00/lb copper, US$3,600/oz gold and US$50/oz silver ("Planning Prices") NPV7% of C$1,023M, 78.2% IRR, and 1.3 year after-tax payback from first production at US$6.50/lb copper, US$4,300/oz gold and US$65/oz silver ("Spot Prices") NPV7% of C$1,385M, 96.3% IRR, and 1.0 year after-tax payback from first production at US$7.50/lb copper, US$5,400/oz gold and US$75/oz silver ("Upside Prices") Capital Efficient Leveraging Existing Infrastructure The Project demonstrates a strong Capital Efficiency Ratio2 with an after-tax NPV to initial capital ratio of 2.7:1 at Planning Prices, increasing to 5.5:1 at Spot Prices highlighting leverage to higher copper, gold and silver prices. The high capital efficiency ratio is a result of road, barge facilities, power transmission line, substation, fuel farm, services, camp, warehouse, workshops, grinding and milling infrastructure, water treatment plant, existing underground development, and general on-site services that are in good working order requiring negligible capital investment to make operational Mine Life-to-Payback2, a ratio which describes the potential for the asset to return capital and provide exposure to positive copper supply-demand fundamentals through the planned mine, is 6.8:1 at Planning Prices Exploration Growth Potential Beyond Current Study Phase 1 52,288 metre drill program completed in April 2026 increased Measured & Indicated Resources in the 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") by 280% and increased contained copper, gold, and silver by 182%, 184% and 188% respectively above the 2025 Mineral Resource Estimate Phase 2 50,000 metre drill program initiated in May 2026 is now 98% complete, the results of which are not included in the 2026 MRE or 2026 PEA mine plan but which continue to extend and expand zones of known mineralization reinforcing significant upside mine life and production potential Water Management and Permitting In designing the Minto Project restart, significant attention was placed on ensuring all of the planned development work and planned operations, including water management, would be within the boundary of the existing Quartz Mining License and would minimize impact on the environment. The Minto Project restart design has also benefitted from input from the Selkirk First Nation. In addition, the upcoming amended permit applications, to be submitted in Q4 2026, do not expect to request or make notable changes to the discharge criteria and requirements currently set for the site The Company believes that by confining development and operating plans to the Quartz Mining License area, by making no significant changes to water discharge criteria, and by working closely with the Selkirk First Nation, the assessment of the amended permit applications can proceed in a timely manner Potential for First Concentrate Production in 2028 Preliminary execution planning, including permitting, underground mine development, and site preparations, supports the potential to deliver first concentrate production in H2 2028 with full-ramp up in mining, milling, and concentrate production by H1 2029 The Company recognizes that it is pursuing a restart plan that requires timely delivery of several scopes of work, including the timely review and elaboration of permit amendment applications, however each scope of work has been assessed in the PEA and the Company has been well-supported by the Selkirk First Nation, suppliers and service providers, specialist contractors, and by the Yukon Government which we expect to continue during the next phase of work Vancouver, British Columbia and Pelly Crossing, Yukon--(Newsfile Corp. - September 22, 2026) - Selkirk Copper Mines Inc. (TSXV: SCMI) (FSE: IO20) (OTCQX: SKRKF) ("Selkirk Copper" or the "Company") is pleased to announce positive economic results of a Preliminary Economic Assessment (the "PEA" or the "Study") for its copper-gold-silver Minto Project (the "Project") located in Yukon, Canada. The PEA provides an in-depth technical and economic assessment of the restart of open pit and underground mining operations, crushing, grinding and flotation operations, and concentrate production activities and outlines a potential pathway to development of a longer-life operation with additional copper-gold-silver concentrate production dependant on further exploration success. M. Colin Joudrie, President & CEO, commented: "Over the past 12 months the team has delivered exceptional results across all aspects of our restart plan from resource discovery, expansion and definition, resource modeling, integrated mine planning, project definition, engineering and design, capital and operating cost estimation, permitting, and Selkirk First Nation engagement. The positive economics described in the PEA create the platform for the Company to pursue a restart decision at the completion of a Feasibility Study and permit amendment receipt in H2-2027 with targeted first concentrate production by H2-2028. The level of detail developed in the PEA study, including integrated mine plans, equipment definition, and detailed capital, operating and sustaining cost estimations, has increased our confidence in our ability to deliver on our focused restart timeline. We look forward to initiating Feasibility Study work and submission of our permit amendment application in late 2026 followed by another MRE Update expected in Q1 2027 which will include results from our Phase 2 50,000 m drill program which is nearing completion. Our entire team recognizes the importance of timely completion of several scopes of work to achieve our restart plan however we are buoyed by the positive outcome of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 drill program, positive restart economics reflected in the PEA, and the opportunity to breathe new life into an asset that has much more to give." Preliminary Economic Assessment Overview The Preliminary Economic Assessment was prepared by a team of independent industry experts, led by Hatch Ltd. ("Hatch") and supported by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. ("SRK"), Fuse Advisors (Part of SLR) ("Fuse"), Moose Mountain Technical Services ("MMTS"), and Ensero Solutions ("Ensero"). Scott Fulton, P.Eng., VP Engineering for the Company and a non-independent Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, has supervised the preparation of this news release and approved the scientific and technical information herein. References to dollars represent Canadian Dollars ($) unless otherwise specified. Abbreviations for thousands ("k") and millions ("M") are used for brevity. The Company intends to file the complete PEA Technical Report on its website (www.selkirkcopper.com) and SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) within 45 days of this press release. Measured & Indicated Resources and Inferred Resources described in the 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate (effective date June 10, 2026) are 47.8 million tonnes at 0.89% copper, 0.34 g/t gold, and 3.2 g/t silver totaling 940 million pounds copper, 530,000 ounces gold, and 4.97 million ounces silver and 16.9 million tonnes at 0.76% copper, 0.26 g/t gold, and 2.7 g/t silver totalling 281 million pounds copper, 142,000 ounces gold, and 1.5 million ounces silver respectively. Applying the proposed development plan described in the PEA results in a mineable inventory of ~18.4 Mt being generated, from both open pit and underground sources, which results in a planned initial mine life of 13 years. The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied that would enable these resources to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. There is no certainty that the projections in the PEA will be realized. Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The PEA has been designed to constrain surface and underground development work and above ground installations and infrastructure to that which can be located within the boundary of the existing Quartz Mining License ("QML") over the entire planned initial 13 year mine life. The Project is based on a 4,100 tpd mining and processing plant operating rate which includes extraction of mineralized material from two (2) primary underground mining areas, two (2) open pits, feeding blended mine material into a new crushing circuit, which then feeds into an existing semi-autogenous and ball mill grinding circuit. Copper-gold-silver bearing minerals are recovered through a new gravity circuit and an existing flotation circuit designed to produce a single copper-gold-silver concentrate product. The PEA considers production of conventional slurry tailings initially placed into previously mined-out pits with a newly designed and engineered retaining dam to be constructed along a portion of the pit edge, then transitioning to a new dry-stack tailings process part way through the mine life. The new PEA dry-stack tailings storage is located at the western margin of the QML. The planned transition to dry-stack tailings is being pursued to reduce impact to the environment. The initial capital costs ("Capex") of the Project, including working capital requirements, owner's costs, and contingency commensurate for the level of study, is estimated to be C$186 million. Sustaining capital costs ("Susex") over the life of mine is estimated to be C$409 million, including a scoping-level estimate of closure and rehabilitation. Operating costs ("Opex") over the life of mine are estimated at C$1,764 million, encompassing mining, processing, tailings, water treatment, site general and administrative costs, and logistics required to support planned production throughout the operation's life. Operating costs are estimated to average C$95.77 per tonne milled over the life of mine, with underground mining representing the largest component of unit costs. Sustaining capital costs over the life of mine are estimated at C$409 million, encompassing underground mine development, mobile equipment replacement, infrastructure renewal, and other capital investments required to maintain the planned production profile and operational performance designed for in the PEA. Sustaining costs are inclusive of the scoping-level estimate of closure and rehabilitation costs expected to be incurred after production operations have ceased. Scoping-level closure and rehabilitation plans, which follow the completion of mining and processing operations, include recontouring, covering, and revegetating necessary areas, deconstruction of structures, rehabilitation of disturbed surface areas, environmental closure, long-term stabilization activities, water and condition monitoring, and necessary logistics to execute these activities. Net Smelter Return ("NSR") estimates were developed and used for open pit optimizations, underground stope development, and classification of mineralized material to be fed to the process plant. NSR estimates used the same assumed metal prices ("Design Prices") as those used to calculate the 2026 MRE, which are US$4.60/lb copper, US$3,300/oz gold, and US$40/oz silver. The NSR values represent the estimated recovered and payable metal value after deductions for treatment and refining charges, transportation and royalties. Prices, recoveries, payabilities and cost deductions were applied consistently across all material types included in the development of open pit and underground mine plans and mineral processing plans. Payabilities, charges, and deduction schedules follow industry-typical concentrate contract structures for copper-gold-silver concentrates. A 1.5% NSR royalty payable to the Selkirk First Nation was applied to all payable metals. The PEA considers submission and elaboration of a permit amendment application to the Yukon Environmental Socio-economic Assessment Board ("YESAB") as well as various other permit applications and amendments in support of exploration, development, and site-specific activities necessary to support planned construction activities and restart of mining, milling and concentrate producing operations. The product of mining and mineral processing activities is a high-grade copper-gold-silver concentrate with a target average grade of 38.0% copper, 12-18 g/t gold, and 100-150 g/t silver with negligible deleterious elements, representing a premium-quality concentrate that compares favourably to the highest-quality copper concentrates produced in the world today. Peak copper-equivalent1 contained in concentrate over the planned initial life of mine is 27,200 tonnes per annum ("tpa"), resulting in 48,700 tpa of high-grade (38% Cu) copper concentrate. Metal contained in mill feed material over the planned initial life of mine is approximately 434 Mlbs of copper, 271 koz of gold, and 2.36 Moz of silver or 653 Mlbs copper-equivalent1. Payable metal contained in concentrate over the planned initial life of mine is approximately 377 Mlbs of copper, 225 koz of gold, and 1.39 Moz of silver, or 552 Mlbs copper-equivalent1. The Project study work, underpinned by a successful 52,288 metre Phase 1 exploration, resource expansion, and resource definition drill program and updated MRE, has resulted in a 13 year mine life. The results from an ongoing Phase 2 50,000 m program, that is nearing completion, have not been incorporated into the PEA but will be incorporated into a Feasibility Study expected to start in Q4 2026. Economic analysis for the PEA was completed using Planning Prices of US$5.00/lb copper, US$3,600/oz gold, and US$50/oz silver, whereas Design Prices which informed the MRE and mineable inventory estimates were US$4.60/lb copper, US$3,300/oz gold, and US$40/oz silver. Economics for the Minto Project, applying Planning Prices and a 7% discount rate result in an after-tax NPV7% of C$494M and after-tax internal rate of return of 47.8%. Due to the relatively low initial capital cost of C$186M estimated to re-establish production, the after-tax payback period from first production is approximately 1.9 years. At Spot Prices of US$6.50/lb copper, US$4,300/oz gold and US$65/oz silver, which represent a rounded average of the quarter-to-date daily cash metal prices quoted on the London Metal Exchange, the after-tax NPV7% increases to C$1,023M, the internal rate of return increases to 78.2%, and the after-tax payback period from first production reduces to 1.3 years. At Upside Prices, which are reflective of potential future commodity prices as a results of a number of fundamental supply-demand factors in copper and increasing interest by global financial institutions and governments in gold and silver as financial instruments, of US$7.50/lb copper, US$5,400/oz gold and US$75/oz silver, the after-tax NPV7% further increases to C$1,385M, the internal rate of return increases to 96.3%, and the after-tax payback period from first production decreases to 1.0 years. In descending order, the Minto Project restart economics are most sensitive to: i) copper price; ii) CAD:USD foreign exchange rate; iii) copper recovery; iv) gold price; and v) operating costs. In addition, project returns are sensitive to mine construction execution timelines and overall investment returns are sensitive to permitting timelines. Reflective of the style and character of the mineralization and the mineralized lenses that comprise the Minto Project, economics of the restart are highly leveraged to copper and gold prices. Table 1: Minto Project PEA Summary at Planning Prices PEA Summary Financial Inputs Units Values Planning Price Assumptions Copper Price US$/lb 5.00 Gold Price US$/oz 3,600 Silver Price US$/oz 50.00 Exchange Rate CAD:USD 0.72 Discount Rate % 7 Key Metrics - Life of Mine (LOM) Mine Life Years 13.0 Tonnes Milled Mt 18.4 Open Pit Strip Ratio W:O 7.9 Daily Mill Throughput tpd 4,100 Annual Mill Throughput Mtpa 1.5 Contained Metal in Mill Feed Copper Mlbs 434 Gold koz 271 Silver Moz 2.4 Copper-equivalent1 Mlbs 653 Processed Feed Grades Copper % 1.07 Gold g/t 0.46 Silver g/t 4.00 Oxide Ratio % 7.5 Copper-equivalent1 % 1.61 Estimated Metal Recoveries: Copper % 88.7 Gold % 84.6 Silver % 77.3 Operating Costs (LOM Average) Underground Mining C$/t milled 34.47 Open Pit Mining C$/t milled 12.20 Processing C$/t milled 15.89 G&A C$/t milled 24.47 Tailings, Environment, and Water C$/t milled 8.74 Total On-Site Operating Costs C$/t milled 95.77 Concentrate Shipping C$/t wet concentrate 342 Copper C1 Net of By-Product Credits2 US$/lb 1.53 Copper-equivalent1 Cash Operating Costs2 US$/lb CuEq1 2.63 Capital Costs Initial Capital Cost (incl. Contingency) C$M 185.9 Sustaining Capital Cost (incl. Closure) C$M 409.3 Project Economics Pre-Tax NPV @ 7% C$M 742.6 After-Tax NPV @ 7% C$M 493.9 Pre-Tax IRR % 54.8 After-Tax IRR % 47.8 After-Tax Payback from First Production Years 1.9 Capital Efficiency Ratio - 2.7   Table 2: Minto Project PEA Economic Sensitivity Downside Planning Spot Upside Copper Price (US$/lb) 3.50 5.00 6.50 7.50 Gold Price (US$/oz) 2,500 3,600 4,300 5,400 Silver Price (US$/oz) 35.00 50.00 65.00 75.00 Copper TC | RCs (US$/t | US$/lb) 35 | 0.035 35 | 0.035 (186) | (0.186) (186) | (0.186) After Tax NPV7% (C$M) 10 494 1,023 1,385 After Tax IRR (%) 9 48 78 96 Payback from First Production (years) 6.5 1.9 1.3 1.0   The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied that would enable these resources to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. There is no certainty that the projections in the PEA will be realized. Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Infrastructure One of the features of the Minto Project, as an integrated mining and milling operation that produced high grade copper concentrates as recently as May 2023, is the substantial surface infrastructure that is available and in place to enable a low-cost restart of operations. Selkirk Copper's engineering and design team and site care and maintenance team, supported by a wide range of third-party experts including those from Hatch, SRK, Fuse, and others, have completed detailed assessments of the usability of site infrastructure and existing equipment. These assessments have determined that the majority of this infrastructure is in good working order requiring only minor attention and refurbishment. Work on repairs and refurbishments has been ongoing since Q3 2025 in an effort to allow activities during the Capex phase to be focused on the critical path items. Listed below are those installations, equipment, and facilities that are not expected to require significant additional investment. Existing Installation, Equipment and Facilities Surface (General) Airstrip Existing accommodations Kitchen and dining hall Main power supply line and substation Maintenance shops (mechanical and electrical) Warehouse Concentrate storage shed Emergency response and First Aid Building Mine and site operations offices Fuel storage and dispensing facility (diesel and gasoline) Propane storage (multiple locations) 3 x Diesel generators Explosives magazine facility Potable water treatment plant Waste disposal sites Changing facilities (the "dry") Mobile equipment wash-bay Gymnasium Process Plant 1 x Semi-Autogenous Grinding Mill 2 x Ball Mills Cyclones Flotation cells (multi-stages) Concentrate thickening and filtration Tailings thickening Reagent storage building Assay laboratory Concentrate storage facility Tailings building Water and Tailings Management Water treatment plant New or significantly rehabilitated or re-established infrastructure, equipment, or facilities necessary for the restart of mining, milling and concentrate production activities are listed below. New Installations, Equipment and Facilities Surface (General) 3 x new diesel generators Upgraded dining facilities Surface Mining 2 x open pit mining areas including pre-stripping, access and haul roads, set-back areas, and water diversion structures 1 x primary waste rock management facility for Ridgetop and 118 Open Pits and underground waste Underground Mining Rehabilitation of the existing underground mine Main fresh air fan (located on surface) Main return air raise Secondary egress escapeways Underground ventilation distribution, services and utilities Sumps New underground mine at Minto North Portal access road and staging area 1,500 m of horizontal development 250 m x 3 m diameter ventilation raise and secondary egress escapeways Ventilation and underground utilities Sumps Crushing Circuit Three-stage crushing and screening circuit Mill feed laydown and blending area Concentrate, Tailings and Water Management Concentrate dryer (screw conveyor/dryer) Tailings cyclones Dry-stack tailings filtration building and related handling facility The PEA modelled Capex period runs from July 1, 2027 until June 30, 2028. Items and costs expected to be incurred before the start of the Capex period ("Pre-Capex") have been excluded from the scope of the PEA and the resultant economic analysis and deemed to be sunk costs. Costs for significant items expected to be incurred in whole or in part during the Pre-Capex period include: dewatering, physical rehabilitation, and re-servicing of the existing underground; ongoing water treatment; deposits for fixed and mobile equipment; refurbishment of two existing backup diesel generators; and other regular site care & maintenance activities. Mineral Resource Summary The Mineral Resources at the Minto Project, described in the updated 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate, are comprised of open pit and underground Measured & Indicated ("M&I") Mineral Resources of 47.8 million tonnes at 0.89% copper, 0.34 g/t gold, and 3.2 g/t silver totaling 940 million pounds copper, 530,000 ounces gold, and 4.97 million ounces silver which represent a 182%, 184% and 188% increase respectively in contained metals above the previous 2025 MRE. The 2026 Measured & Indicated Resources include 26.0 million tonnes of underground resources at 1.14% copper, 0.49 g/t gold, and 4.4 g/t silver; and 21.8 million tonnes of open pit resources at 0.59% copper, 0.17 g/t gold, and 1.8 g/t silver. In addition, the Minto Project has combined open pit and underground Inferred Mineral Resources of 16.9 million tonnes at 0.76% copper, 0.26 g/t gold, and 2.7 g/t silver containing 281 million pounds copper, 142,000 ounces gold, and 1.5 million ounces silver. Inferred Mineral Resources are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. Mineralization in several of the zones and lenses across the central mine area remain open laterally and at depth and there are several high potential drill targets for follow-up in future exploration, definition and delineation work. The ongoing 50,000 metre Phase 2 drill program is 98% complete, the results of which have not been included in the PEA. Initial assay results and visual drill logs continue to show expansion potential across each of the mineralized zones in the central mine area. The results of the Phase 2 drill program will be incorporated into an updated MRE scheduled for completion in Q1 2027, which will form the basis of an updated set of integrated mines plans in a Feasibility Study scheduled to commence in Q4 2026. Table 3: Current Mineral Resource Estimate Type Cutoff Class ROM In situ Grades Metal (CDN$) Tonnage (000) NSR (CDN$) Cu (%) Au (gpt) Ag (gpt) Ox Ratio ASCu (%) Cu (Mlbs) Au (Koz) Ag (Koz) Open Pit $30 Indicated 21,779 $80.63 0.59 0.17 1.8 0.11 0.073 283 122 1,294 Inferred 7,052 $74.61 0.55 0.13 1.6 0.08 0.048 85 30 354 UG $80 Measured 348 $153.47 0.92 0.39 3.3 0.05 0.041 7 4 36 Indicated 25,679 $189.20 1.15 0.49 4.4 0.06 0.067 650 404 3,638 Meas + Ind 26,027 $188.72 1.15 0.49 4.4 0.06 0.070 657 408 3,674 Inferred 9,812 $146.57 0.91 0.36 3.5 0.05 0.044 196 112 1,113 Total Varies as Above Meas + Ind 47,806 $139.48 0.89 0.34 3.2 0.08 0.070 940 530 4,969 Inferred 16,865 $116.48 0.76 0.26 2.7 0.06 0.046 281 142 1,467   Notes to Table 3: The MRE has been completed by Sue Bird of Moose Mountain Technical Services (MMTS). The effective date of the resource is June 10, 2026 Resources are reported using the 2014 CIM Definition Standards and were estimated using the 2019 CIM Best Practices Guidelines. For the Net Smelter Proceeds (NSP) calculations: Metal prices are USD$4.60/lb Cu, USD$3,300/oz Au, USD$40/oz Ag; A currency exchange rate of 0.72 US$ per CDN$; 97.5% payable Cu, 98% payable Au and 92% payable Ag; and the following inputs: Concentrate grade of 38% Cu with a moisture content of 8%; Unit deductions of 1gpt Au, 30gpt Ag; Offsite costs (refining, transport and insurance) of US$200/dmt; Treatment for Cu Charges of USD$35, Refining Charges of USD$0.035/lb payable Cu, USD$5.00/oz Au and USD$0.50/oz Ag; Royalties of 1.5% NSR. Recoveries are as follows: CuRecov - 95.5%+1.07*Cu%-113*(ASCu/TCu), with a maximum of 98% AuRecov = 35.63+0.58032*Curecov-1.3341*Cu%^ 0.8932, with a maximum of 85% AgRecov = 69.4+1.9*Aggpt, to a maximum of 85% These inputs result in the following NSR and CuEq equations: NSR = CDN$CuNSP*CuRecov*Cu%*22.0462 + CDN$AuNSP*AuRecov*Augpt + CD$AgNSP*AgRecov*Aggpt)/31.10348 CuEq = NSR/(CuNSP*CuRecov*22.0462) The Mineral Resource has been confined by a "reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction" pit or underground shape using the 130% base case NSR for the Ridgetop and Area 118 open pits and by confining shapes for the underground. Mining costs are CDN$4.58/tonne for open pit, marginal mining costs of CDN$50/tonne for underground, Processing costs are CDN$30/tonne milled, and G&A costs are CDN$20/tonne milled. Pit slope angles are assumed at 45º. The specific gravity of the deposit has been assigned based on domain as between 2.578 and 2.842 based on sg measurements in the Minto deposit. Oxide Ratio = (ASCu)/ (Total Copper) Numbers may not add due to rounding. Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Mining Overview The PEA considers both open-pit and underground mining designed to extract the copper-gold-silver mineralization defined in the 2026 MRE. The resource comprises multiple shallow-dipping metamorphosed copper-gold-silver mineralized lenses distributed across the Ridgetop and Area 118 open pit domains, and the Minto East, Minto North, Copper Keel and Area 118 underground domains. Historically, underground mining has taken place in Copper Keel and Minto East domains accessed from one primary underground portal and decline located between the planned Ridgetop and Area 118 open pits. Figure 1: Site Plan Including Existing and Planned New Mining and Development To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11605/315393_c39a3cd6f411fbfd_001full.jpg The PEA adopts a mining approach that combines open pit and underground mining methods to best align with the geometry, metallurgical characteristics, and development sequence of the Minto deposits. Underground mining is planned to provide the entire mill feed in the initial years of operation, with open pit mining introduced later in the mine life as the Ridgetop and then Area 118 open pits are developed. Open pit mining will contribute mill feed from the open pit deposits using contractor-operated truck-shovel operations, deploying selective flitch mining to maintain grade control across thin, structurally complex near-surface lenses. Underground mining will be carried out in the Minto North, Minto East, Copper Keel, and Area 118 deposits using longhole open stoping in an upper-cut retreat sequence with rib pillars. Following commencement of open pit mining, underground and open pit mining will operate in tandem, with material blended from the different deposits to support metallurgical performance and maintain process plant feed quality. Both the open pit and underground mining method closely align with historical practices at the Minto Project and reflect the integration of updated geotechnical parameters, stope dimensions and pillar criteria developed for the restart. Table 4: PEA LOM Mineable Inventory Summary Mining Area Tonnes Copper (%) Gold (g/t) Silver (g/t) Oxide Ratio (%) Open Pit Combined 6,021,881 0.83% 0.25 2.64 13%    Ridgetop 5,627,794 0.82% 0.26 2.69 13%    Area 118 Open Pit 394,087 0.96% 0.09 1.84 13% Underground Combined 12,352,286 1.19% 0.56 4.67 5%    Copper Keel 5,662,282 1.16% 0.50 4.18 5%    Minto East 2,818,372 1.24% 0.62 5.15 5%    Minto North 2,169,259 1.36% 0.67 5.83 2%    Area 118 Underground 1,702,374 0.98% 0.52 4.03 7% Total 18,374,167 1.07% 0.46 4.00 7%   The continued use of longhole open stoping, incorporating rib pillars, was selected as the most practical approach for the PEA based on deposit geometry, geotechnical conditions, historical operating experience at Minto and overall project economics. The method provides an appropriate balance between production objectives, capital efficiency, operational simplicity and execution risk, while leveraging existing infrastructure and minimizing development requirements, power demand and startup capital. The approach is consistent with the study's geotechnical criteria and supports a phased restart strategy with reduced schedule and operational complexity. Future engineering studies may evaluate opportunities to optimize resource recovery; however, any alternative mining approaches would be assessed based on their impact on project economics, capital requirements, operating costs, power availability, execution complexity, and overall project value. As part of the planned Minto Project restart, the existing underground workings will be dewatered, inspected and rehabilitated as required to support safe re-entry to and use of historical haulageways and access the new production areas envisioned for the PEA mine plan. Achieving the planned production profile described in the PEA is dependent on the successful and timely dewatering, inspection and targeted rehabilitation of existing underground workings, development of new underground access infrastructure, establishment of the planned underground mining areas and execution of the planned mine development schedule. The extent and nature of required rehabilitation activities in the existing underground development will be determined following underground inspections completed as dewatering progresses. Due to its location and lack of practical connectivity opportunities to the existing underground workings, the Minto North deposit will be accessed via the development of a new dedicated portal located in close proximity to the existing processing infrastructure. Later in the mine life, a dedicated and additional Copper Keel portal will be established to reduce underground haulage distance from the deposit, enhancing haulage productivity and reducing reliance on the longer route through the existing portal. The integrated open pit and underground mine plans have been designed to consider the oxidation characteristics of the mineralized zones in the Ridgetop and Area 118 open pits as defined in the 2026 MRE. Near-surface mineralization at Ridgetop in particular displays variable and often elevated oxidation ratios, with recent assessments indicating a mix of oxidation that is typically more pronounced in the shallow zones. Modelled oxidation at the Ridgetop deposit generally decreases with depth, with mineralization transitioning into less oxidized and more sulphide-dominant material. This variability introduces additional considerations for blending and mill feed management, as elevated oxide ratios in the mill feed have the potential to reduce copper recovery and increase concentrate moisture, particularly at oxidation ratios exceeding 20% soluble copper to total copper. Maintaining the operational blend within acceptable limits is an important element of the mining and mineral processing strategy developed for the Minto Project. Metallurgy & Processing Overview Since the acquisition of the Project by Selkirk Copper, a thorough assessment of the process plant was conducted by the Company, consultants, and vendor representatives. Assessment in the PEA evaluated the potential for targeted circuit upgrades to enable the resumption of operations at a consistent average throughput of 4,100 tpd at 92% process plant availability. The process plant historically employed standard comminution, flotation and dewatering techniques and equipment in the production of a final copper-gold-silver concentrate and no substantive technology or process changes are considered in the restart plan. Planned upgrades include a new three-stage crushing circuit with screening, two (2) new gravity concentrators to improve gold recovery, a screw dryer to handle concentrate material after filtration to enable the delivery of a consistent concentrate moisture content within control limits, and slurry tailings pumps and cyclones to segregate fine and coarse size fractions for in-pit deposition. The addition of tailings filtration is planned to enable the transition to dry-stack tailings management after Year 3. The designed process flowsheet includes run-of-mine mill feed stockpile, three-stage crushing and screening, crushed feedstock stockpile and drawdown, primary semi-autogenous and ball mill grinding mills, gravity concentration, flotation, concentrate thickening, drying and filtration, and tailings thickening and filtration. The overall process flow diagram depicted in Figure 2 identifies the currently existing process flowsheet in black with new, upgraded, or modified aspects of the flow sheet depicted in blue. Equipment planned to be added part-way through the mine life is shown in gray. Figure 2: Process Flow Diagram To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11605/315393_c39a3cd6f411fbfd_002full.jpg Run-of-mine ("ROM") material will be delivered to the crusher area by haulage trucks. This feed will be managed through dedicated ROM stockpiles at the crushing pad to allow blending of material from different mining areas prior to crushing. A new surface crushing and material handling system has been incorporated into the design to support the delivery of ROM material from both underground and open pit sources to the processing plant and provide the ability to control the blending of material of different compositions to control feed grade and oxide ratio. Crushed material will be conveyed to a stockpile immediately above the hopper feeding the apron feeder with a nominal live capacity of approximately 9,800 tonnes. Crushed material will be reclaimed using an existing apron feeder and transferred by conveyor to the semi-autogenous grinding ("SAG") mill feed chute. Material in this stockpile which is not automatically fed by gravity will be managed with a front-end loader as needed. The existing grinding circuit is comprised of a primary SAG mill equipped with a 900 horsepower ("HP") drive motor, operating in open circuit, followed by two parallel secondary ball mills, each powered by a 900 HP drive motor and configured in parallel closed circuits. The PEA includes provision for upgrades and refurbishment of select grinding circuit components, including the SAG mill drive system. Each ball mill operates in closed circuit with its associated cyclone cluster and with the underflow from the cyclones returning to the corresponding ball mill for further size reduction. Discharge from each ball mill will be directed to the respective of two new Knelson gravity concentrators to improve recoveries of gold and silver prior to reporting to the flotation circuit. The rougher-scavenger flotation circuit consists of three (3) rougher tank cells followed by five (5) scavenger tank cells arranged in series designed to produce copper-gold-silver mineral concentrates at a solids concentration of approximately 35% weight. The cleaner flotation circuit comprises four (4) cleaner tank cells arranged in a single bank. The cleaner circuit is fed by rougher concentrate, rougher scavenger concentrate, and recleaner tailings. Cleaner concentrate is pumped to the recleaner flotation stage for further upgrading. The recleaner circuit consists of six (6) flotation cells in a single bank. Final concentrate from the recleaner circuit is directed to the concentrate thickener for dewatering, while recleaner tailings are returned to the cleaner flotation circuit. No material modifications to the existing flotation circuit are contemplated other than refurbishment and reconditioning of the existing flotation cells. On-stream analyzers will be retrofitted with new probes and non-radioactive sources to restore analytical functionality. The primary equipment in the concentrate dewatering circuit is a 9.4-metre diameter high-rate thickener. The thickener is designed to produce a thickened underflow at approximately 70% weight solids, which is directed to the concentrate filtration stage. Thickened concentrate is dewatered using an existing ceramic disc filter. To reliably achieve target moisture limits of 8-10% in the concentrate, a new screw dryer, replacing the concentrate conveyor under the ceramic concentrate filter, will be installed. Concentrate produced from this circuit is placed in an onsite storage shed with nominal storage capacity of approximately 18,000 tonnes of concentrate which is sufficient to manage the storage requirements for periods when concentrate cannot be shipped from the site due to the seasonal inability to cross the Yukon River. Concentrate produced at site is expected to be transported using 25 t or 50 t trucks along the 27 km site access road, across the Yukon River by barge or ice bridge, and 425 km along the Klondike Highway to the Port of Skagway, Alaska, USA where it will be shipped via tidewater to market for further processing. Tailings management will be carried out in two phases: Phase 1 (Years 1-3): Construction of the Area 2 dam, then in-pit deposition of thickened slurry tailings using cyclones close to the point of deposition; and Phase 2 (after Year 3): New tailings filtration plant and filtered tailings stacking and landforming (dry-stack tailings and some structural waste rock) The dry stack facility construction, purchase of associated equipment and pipelines, and all earthworks are part of sustaining capital investments in years 2-3. Preliminary metallurgical test work carried out by Blue Coast Research in Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 suggests that copper recoveries in low, moderate, and highly oxidized material can be significantly improved by pursuing a targeted blending strategy of unoxidized or sulphide-dominant mineralized material mixed with variably oxidized material. Although there is evidence that improved recoveries can be achieved, historic recovery assumptions are being applied in the PEA. A comprehensive geo-metallurgical test program is planned for the Feasibility Study to further validate recovery assumptions across the range of mineralization types expected in the mine plan and to evaluate opportunities for recovery improvement identified in the preliminary test work. Water Management and Permitting The proposed mine plans for the Minto Project restart occur within the same catchments as the previously assessed waste rock impoundment, storage areas and deposits ("WRD"). At this stage the future waste rock generated is anticipated to have similar geochemical properties (such as metal-leaching and acid generation characteristics, trace element leaching, and neutralizing potential) as have existed previously and been managed on site. Characterization of mineralized waste rock has shown that a small proportion may be potentially acid generating ("PAG"). Continuation of the prior operational waste rock characterization and management programs will support the segregation of mineralized waste rock for disposal in long-term saturated storage (e.g., backfilled underground or submerged in mined-out pits). The Minto Project restart is building on a comprehensive set of prior assessments and monitoring programs which include the following eight (8) principal programs: i) Surface Water Surveillance Program; ii) Metal Mine Effluent Regulations Monitoring Program (now Mining and Diamond Mining Effluent Regulations ("MDMER") Program); iii) Groundwater Monitoring Program; iv) Seepage Monitoring Program; v) Geochemical Monitoring Program; vi) Meteorological Monitoring Program; vii) Physical Monitoring Program; and viii) Aquatic Environmental Monitoring Program ("AEMP"). Based on the proposed Site development layout and the locations of existing surface water monitoring stations, and the aforementioned monitoring programs, the current water monitoring network is considered sufficient to capture potential surface water effects associated with the proposed restart. This analysis is based on the spatial relationship between planned disturbance areas, site drainage patterns, and downstream monitoring locations. The available dataset and the surface water quality characterization provide a good understanding of general water-quality patterns at the Minto Project, including seasonal influences, operational effects, and discharge-related responses. Regardless of past information and experience, the Minto Project restart plan includes an adaptive management plan which is designed to manage site wide water, including through freshet, as well as to protect the overall environment. An updated Water Management Plan ("WMP"), based on segregation of clean runoff and mine-impacted water, has been developed for the site that is similar to previous water management plans. The restart plan described in the PEA adheres to prior water quality discharge criteria, specifically an Effluent Quality Standard ("EQS") and a Water Quality Objective ("WQO"), that have been used successfully in the past to protect water and environment adjacent to the Minto Project site. Figure 3 shows a simplified schematic overview of the water flow on site during the early years of the PEA plan. Figure 3: Minto Site Water Block Flow Diagram To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11605/315393_c39a3cd6f411fbfd_003full.jpg The Minto Project has a regulatory and permitting history extending back approximately three decades. The original mine development was reviewed in 1997 under the federal Environmental Assessment and Review Process, prior to the implementation of the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Act ("YESAA"). Following implementation of YESAA, substantial changes to the Minto operation were assessed by the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board ("YESAB"), principally through the Mayo Designated Office, and it is on these past assessments that the planned amended permit applications have been developed. Three key authorizations are considered in the Minto Project restart plan, specifically for the Quartz Mining License (QML-001), the Type A Water License (QZ14-031), and the Class 4 Mining Land Use Approval (LQ00565d). Past assessments concluded that potential adverse environmental effects of the proposed development could be mitigated and that the project could proceed subject to applicable mitigation and regulatory requirements. The Company is advancing its amended permit applications building on successful mitigation and monitoring plans that are well understood by the Yukon Regulator and the Selkirk First Nation. Concentrate Marketing The Project is expected to produce up to 49,000 tonnes of copper concentrate per year grading 38% copper that contains significant gold and silver by-products with negligible deleterious or penalty elements. Calgacus AG ("Calgacus"), a specialist advisor on commercial and logistical matters related to critical mineral concentrate trading, has ascertained that mineral concentrate from the Project will be one of a few high-grade copper (>35%) concentrate products potentially available to the market before 2030 and, given its lack of associated penalty elements, high concentrate grade, and precious-metal credits, is expected to attract premium pricing and offtake terms. The Project's copper concentrate will be a highly desirable product for copper and gold smelter-refineries and concentrate blending facilities, where trading companies and/or smelting-refining companies are expected to mix the high-quality product with other lower-grade and/or more complex concentrates. Copper smelters typically charge a Treatment Charge ("TC") for smelting a concentrate and a Refining Charge ("RC") to refine the copper and by-product metals, in this case gold and silver, into a finished product purity and form. TCs are typically quoted on a US$ per dry metric tonne ("dmt") of concentrate basis, and RCs are typically quoted on a US$ per mass unit of contained metal (lb or troy oz) basis. From 2016 to 2023, benchmark TCs and RCs averaged US$78/dmt and 7.8 US¢/lb payable copper, respectively. During this period, although there was limited incentive to build new copper smelters globally, provincial governments in China were willing to finance the construction of smelters to boost local GDP and employment levels. More recently, with the construction of new smelters and refineries in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia and India, there has been a significant increase in global concentrate processing capacity, far outstripping copper mine output growth. This imbalance between supply and processing capacity of copper concentrates has led to acute tightening in the concentrate market and a corresponding sharp drop in TCs and RCs driven by increased competition for product, with the annual contract levels in 2024-2026 averaging US$33.8/dmt and 3.38 US¢/lb, respectively. Calgacus estimates that, in view of the expected large copper concentrate deficits for the foreseeable future, the Company will easily be able to achieve a full sale of its future concentrate production and recommends using a long-term assumption for the annual benchmark TC of USD $35/dmt, a copper RC of 3.5 US¢/lb payable of copper, a gold RC of USD $5/oz, and a silver RC of USD $0.50/oz for the 13 year project life. Demand for refined copper remains robust, driven by electrification, grid investment, electric vehicles and, increasingly, data-centre construction, which resulted in copper prices reaching record levels in 2026. In this environment, clean, high-grade concentrates such as the Project's carry particular strategic value in the market: smelters and traders blend them with lower-grade or more complex concentrates to meet smelter feed specifications, which supports payability, treatment terms and offtake demand at or better than industry-standard levels. In the Minto Project's historical operations from 2007 to 2023 more than 640,000 tonnes of copper concentrate were produced, typically comprised of a mixture of chalcopyrite and bornite minerals with minimal other sulphides, resulting in high metallurgical recoveries and concentrate grades between 32% to 52% copper (averaging 39% copper), plus gold and silver. The Project expects to achieve an average copper grade of 38% in concentrate, with 12-18 g/t of contained gold, 100-150 g/t of silver and no deleterious elements which would incur penalty terms. Other assumptions include: Copper concentrates produced by the Project will be either sold directly to smelters (most likely in Asia) or to metal traders Total off-site transportation costs have been estimated at C$342/wet metric tonne ("wmt") and assume trucking to Skagway, Alaska and then ocean shipping to smelters or blending facilities, most likely in Asia Copper will be payable as per normal industry practice for high grade copper concentrates TCs and RCs will be netted off the final payable amount as per normal industry practice, and no 'cost discount' for the high copper grades in the concentrate has been assumed Gold and silver will be payable as metal credits as per normal industry practice In advance of a potential investment decision, Selkirk Copper intends to engage with potential concentrate offtakers from the smelting and trading community to introduce the Project's expected concentrate specification, confirm market appetite, and solicit indicative treatment and refining terms. A formal marketing process is planned to run in parallel with the next stage of technical studies and project financing option evaluation. The Company expects to shortlist a group of smelters and trading houses, distribute a concentrate marketing package (specification, production profile and logistics chain), and negotiate term sheets to evaluate offtake and associated financing's potential to cover a portion of the upfront capital costs. Binding offtake agreements would be targeted for execution either in advance of, or concurrent with, an investment & restart decision and project financing. As the historical concentrate offtake agreement and precious metals stream which previously encumbered the Project were removed through the bankruptcy process, Selkirk Copper's offtake position is fully unencumbered. Offtake-linked prepayments or concentrate-backed facilities therefore represent a potential source of non-dilutive financing for the restart, and Selkirk Copper intends to test appetite for such structures as part of the marketing process. Selkirk Copper has not entered into any contracts for concentrate sales at this time and has used conservative treatment and refining charge bases for its economic analysis. Capital Costs Overview The capital cost estimate was developed to target an Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering ("AACE") Class 5 estimate accuracy range of -50% to +100%. Several aspects of this estimate have a level of maturity supported by multiple budget quotes and field-level examinations of equipment condition which have enabled the assessment of contingency on an individual entry basis increasing the overall level of accuracy. All costs are provided in Q2 2026 Canadian dollars. No escalation has been applied. The estimate includes direct and indirect costs, owner's costs and contingency for the Project to support the goal of commencement of construction in mid-2027 and the recommencement of mining and processing operations in H2 2028. These costs have been classified as follows: Initial capital cost (Capex) - this includes the expenditures required for the period after the Pre-Capex site upgrades and the commencement of operations in order to achieve the production rate ramp up to 4,100 tpd between mid-2027 and H2 2028 Sustaining capital cost (Susex) - this includes the estimate for capital costs during the operations phase in order to maintain an average production rate of 4,100 tpd from the start of operations to end of the mine life Closure and rehabilitation costs - this includes a Scoping-level cost estimate for removal of infrastructure and restoration of the site post-production to a natural state including ongoing monitoring as required The Capex includes mining, process plant, water treatment, tailings management, field-based assessment of additional infrastructure upgrades and repairs necessary prior to commencement of operations and recommended upgrades to support sustained production to meet Project objectives. The Susex commences at the start of the post-construction period on 1 July 2028 and is expressed in Q2 2026 Canadian dollars (C$), excluding taxes. These costs are presented on a nominal, un-escalated basis, with no contingency included for excavations, and have been calculated from first principles using the same basis as for the construction period. Equipment rebuilds, additional primary mobile equipment, and other underground equipment have been estimated in the applicable year of requirements and have had contingency applied. The level of detail in the estimate has also enabled the application of contingency to be assessed for each entry reflecting the level of maturity and confidence in the total cost while considering the planned start date of the construction period. This has resulted in an aggregated overall contingency instead of applying one contingency to the whole estimate. A summary of Capex and Susex by area over the life of the mine is shown in Table 5 below (values may not sum due to rounding). Table 5: Capex and Susex Summary Classification Capex (C$M) Susex (C$M) Site General 2.4 - Mining 77.6 220.3 Processing 12.0 - Surface Facilities - Other 5.0 - Surface Utilities 5.1 6.1 Transportation - On and Off Site 0.2 - Tailings Ponds & Disposal 6.6 68.4 Surface Storage Stockpiles & Dumps 43.6 Closure & Rehabilitation 70.8 Indirects 54.3 Contingency 22.6 Total Capex 185.9 409.3   Operating Costs Overview The operating cost estimate for the Project has been developed using contractor-based inputs, internal benchmark costing, and first-principles methodologies appropriate for a PEA. All costs are presented in C$ in real Q2 2026 terms, unless otherwise stated. Operating costs comprise the following major components: Open pit mining Underground mining Processing Tailings Site general and administrative ("G&A") The overall cost structure reflects the production plan, mine design criteria, and the operating assumptions defined for the PEA. See Table 6 and Table 7 for a summary of operating costs. Table 6: Life of Mine Opex Summary by Area Unit Opex Units LOM Average Underground Mining C$/t mill feed 51.28 Open Pit Mining C$/t mined 4.39 Processing C$/t milled 15.89 Tailings C$/t tailings 4.89 Water Treatment C$/t milled 4.03 G&A C$/t milled 24.47 Total On-Site Opex Cost C$/t milled 95.77   Table 7: Life of Mine Opex Summary Normalized Unit Opex Units LOM Average Underground Mining C$/t milled 34.47 Open Pit Mining C$/t milled 12.20 Processing C$/t milled 15.89 Tailings C$/t milled 4.71 Water Treatment C$/t milled 4.03 G&A C$/t milled 24.47 Total On-Site Opex Cost C$/t milled 95.77   Processing operating costs are developed from defined concentrator operating assumptions, reflecting expected plant throughput and availability. The design basis assumes an annual throughput of 1,496,500 tonnes per year, achieved through a nominal processing rate of 186 tonnes per hour over 8,059 operating hours per year, equivalent to a daily throughput of 4,100 tpd. Overall plant availability is estimated at 92%, supporting continuous, stable mill operations and forming the foundation for the processing Opex estimates. G&A costs represent all other costs not included directly in the construction or operating of the site facilities and which are required to sustain operations. These costs include: Technical services (engineering, geology) Site services (water management and treatment, mobile equipment, roads, utilities, logistics) Health, safety & environment Human resources Information technology Camp operations (accommodations and catering for all site personnel) Chartered travel (aircraft, bus) from Whitehorse Warehousing and procurement Mine site administration These costs were developed by: Reviewing the historical full-site operating budget Removing non-recurring or non-operational items (e.g., isolation-related costs, discretionary exploration) Escalating retained cost categories to Q1 2026 levels First principles build up for the number of on-site personnel including ramp up to steady state operations Project Life of Mine Summary - Planning Prices To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11605/315393_selkprojtbl.jpg Qualified Persons Scott Fulton, P.Eng, VP Engineering for the Company and a non-independent Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, has prepared, validated, and approved the scientific and technical information in this news release. The PEA was prepared by a team of independent industry experts, led by Hatch and supported by SRK, Fuse, MMTS, and Ensero. The affiliations and areas of responsibility of individuals who assisted in preparation of portions of the PEA are provided below. Steve Ball, P.Eng. (Hatch Ltd.) - Property Details, History, Project Infrastructure, Capital & Operating Costs Michael Bobotis, Ing. (Hatch Ltd.) - Mining Methods Jing Zhao, P.Eng. (Hatch Ltd.) - Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing, Recovery Methods Duncan MacGregor, Pri.Sci.Nat. (Hatch Ltd.) - Economic Analysis Sue Bird, P.Eng. (Moose Mountain Technical Services) - Geological Setting & Mineralization, Deposit Types, Exploration, Drilling, Mineral Resource Estimates John Kurylo, P.Eng. (SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.) - Waste & Water Management Bruce Murphy, P.Eng. (SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.) - Rock Mechanics Grant Carlson, P.Eng. (Fuse Advisors, Part of SLR) - Market Studies & Contracts About Selkirk First Nation Selkirk First Nation is centered in Pelly Crossing, a community in central Yukon, 280 km north of Whitehorse. They are a self-governing First Nation, having signed its Final and Self-Government Agreements in 1997. Selkirk First Nation owns 4,740 square kilometers of Settlement Land, including 2,408 square kilometers where they own both the surface and subsurface. Selkirk First Nation is one of three self-governing Northern Tutchone First Nations in the Yukon. The Selkirk First Nation, indirectly, holds a controlling equity stake in Selkirk Copper. About Selkirk Copper Selkirk Copper is a well-financed, newly formed company with a controlling interest held by the Selkirk First Nation through its wholly owned subsidiary, that, in partnership with the Selkirk First Nation, is completing a thorough exploration drilling campaign and a restart and redevelopment plan for the former Minto copper-gold-silver mine based on best-in-class environmentally sustainable mining, development and reclamation practice. Selkirk Copper controls 26,850 hectares of prospective mineral claims located in the Minto-Carmacks copper belt as well as significant open-pit and underground infrastructure, a 4,100 tonne per day processing plant, 400-person full-rotation camp, water treatment facilities, numerous ancillary buildings, and mobile equipment centered on the former Minto copper-gold-silver mine. Selkirk Copper's mineral tenure, operation infrastructure, access roads and powerline, is located on or adjacent to Lands of the Selkirk First Nation much of which is surrounded by prospective Selkirk First Nation Category A Lands. Selkirk Copper Mines Inc. is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol TSXV: SCMI, has a secondary listing on the Frankfurt Exchange under the symbol FSE: IO20, and its common shares trade under the symbol OTCQX: SKRKF on the OTCQX® Best Market, a U.S. marketplace operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. On behalf of the Board of Directors of Selkirk Copper Mines Inc. M. Colin Joudrie President and Chief Executive Officer For more information, please contact: M. Colin Joudrie, President & CEO [email protected] (604) 760-3157 Justin Stevens, Vice-President Corporate Development [email protected] (604) 240-2959 Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION Except for the statements of historical fact, this news release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. When used in this news release, the words "estimate", "project", "belief", "anticipate", "intend", "expect", "plan", "predict", "may" or "should" and the negative of these words, or variations thereon or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking information. The forward-looking information in this news release includes information relating to: the results of the PEA, including after-tax NPV and IRR; the target mine life, mill throughput, and commodity price scenarios; estimated capital costs, sustaining capital costs, closure and rehabilitation costs, and operating costs; estimated life of mine production, metallurgical recoveries, and expected concentrate quality, grade and marketability; the potential for first concentrate production in H2 2028 and full ramp-up by H1 2029; the plan to submit amended permit applications in Q4 2026 and the anticipated permitting timeline; the commencement of a Feasibility Study in Q4 2026 and an updated MRE in Q1 2027; expected concentrate marketing, offtake demand, and treatment and refining terms; the filing of the Technical Report and timing thereof; the use of the MRE for the development of an updated PEA; potential for improvement in quality of the Company's mine plans; development of an updated mine plan and targeted mine life; the remainder of the Company's drill program and integrating results into ongoing studies results and the support of a feasibility study and the timing thereof; technical and economic factors that may influence prospects of economic extraction; the business plans and objectives of the Company; and future planned drilling and feasibility study work. Such forward-looking information is based on the Company's expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release. By its nature, forward-looking information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements, including but not limited to: the potential inability of the Company to continue as a going concern, risks associated with potential governmental and/or regulatory action with respect to the Company's operations, delays in or the potential inability of the Company to obtain necessary regulatory approvals, fluctuations in the price of copper, gold and silver, environmental risks, the accuracy of capital and operating cost estimates, risks related to the condition of existing underground workings and rehabilitation requirements, risks related to metallurgical recovery assumptions and oxide ratio variability, risks related to the availability and retention of skilled personnel and contractors, the potential inability of the Company to implement its business plan going forward, including but not limited to completing the remainder of the Company's drill program, completing the PEA and Technical Report, and the development of an updated mine plan and targeted mine life. In connection with the forward-looking information contained in this news release, the Company has made assumptions about: metal prices; exchange rates; metal recoveries; capital cost estimate accuracy; the timely receipt of necessary permits and regulatory approvals; the successful dewatering and rehabilitation of existing underground workings; the availability of financing on reasonable terms; and the Company's ability to execute on its business plans. The Company has also assumed that no significant events will occur outside the Company's normal course of business. Although the Company believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking information are reasonable, forward-looking information is not a guarantee of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such information due to the inherent uncertainty therein. Any forward-looking information speaks only as of the date on which it is made and, except as may be required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise. NON-IFRS FINANCIAL MEASURES This news release refers to certain financial measures that are not recognized under International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), including "Capital Efficiency Ratio", "Mine Life-to-Payback", "Copper C1 Net of By-Product Credits", and "Copper-equivalent Cash Operating Costs". These non-IFRS financial measures do not have standardized meanings under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other issuers. The Company believes these measures provide useful supplemental information to investors for the purpose of evaluating the potential economic performance of the Minto Project as described in the PEA. Capital Efficiency Ratio is calculated as the after-tax NPV divided by initial capital cost. Mine Life-to-Payback is calculated as the planned mine life in years divided by the after-tax payback period from first production. Copper C1 Net of By-Product Credits represents the cash cost per pound of payable copper produced, including treatment and refining charges, net of by-product revenue from gold and silver, and is derived from the PEA operating cost estimates and production profile. Copper-equivalent Cash Operating Costs represent total on-site cash operating costs expressed on a per-pound copper-equivalent basis using Planning Prices. These non-IFRS measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with IFRS. 1 Copper-equivalent values are calculated using Planning Prices. Where applicable, production mass values are net of estimated recoveries, minimum deductions, and payabilities. Costs on a copper-equivalent basis use copper-equivalent mass values as a denominator CuEq_Mass = Cu_Mass + (Au_Mass × Au_Price + Ag_Mass × Ag_Price) ÷ Cu_Price CuEq_% = Cu_% + (Au_g_per_tonne ÷ 31.1035 × Au_Price + Ag_g_per_tonne ÷ 31.1035 × Ag_Price) ÷ (Cu_Price × 2204.62) 2 This is a non-IFRS financial measure. See "Non-IFRS Financial Measures" for more details. To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/315393