Northwire Canada EditionThursday, August 13, 2026
Northwire
CD 0.245 +8.9% DRY 0.310 +1.6% PAAS 73.10 +1.3% S 0.250 −2.0% VOXR 7.22 −0.4% NFG 2.32 +0.0% MFG 3.70 +0.0% ITH 3.90 +1.8% DML 4.59 +0.0% SEVA 0.285 −5.0% CLM 0.055 −8.3% ORE 2.65 −0.4% OOR 0.050 +0.0% MJS 0.095 −5.0% DBG 2.01 −1.0% MOG 0.630 +8.6% CD 0.245 +8.9% DRY 0.310 +1.6% PAAS 73.10 +1.3% S 0.250 −2.0% VOXR 7.22 −0.4% NFG 2.32 +0.0% MFG 3.70 +0.0% ITH 3.90 +1.8% DML 4.59 +0.0% SEVA 0.285 −5.0% CLM 0.055 −8.3% ORE 2.65 −0.4% OOR 0.050 +0.0% MJS 0.095 −5.0% DBG 2.01 −1.0% MOG 0.630 +8.6%
Drill Results

Integral Metals talks Kap soil geochemistry results

INTG · Price

Executive Summary

  • Integral Metals completed a comprehensive 2025 soil geochemistry program on the Kap project, analyzing 2,164 samples (2,040 B‑horizon) to identify near‑surface geochemical anomalies.
  • 818 samples exhibited two or more anomalies; 128 samples scored 7 or higher, with two reaching the maximum composite score of 11, concentrating around the Main showing.
  • The data set will be integrated with existing geological, drilling and geophysical information to prioritize new drill targets for the next exploration phase.

Key Details

  • Survey Scope: 2,164 soil samples collected; 2,040 B‑horizon soils processed for multielement analysis (Zn, Pb, Cd, Tl, Ba, Sr).
  • Laboratory Work: Sample preparation by ALS Canada Ltd. (Yellowknife) – screened to < 180 µm, pulped; digestion with four‑acid method; ICP‑MS (ME‑MS61L) and ICP‑AES (ME‑OG62, Zn‑OG62) analyses.
  • Quality Assurance: 174 field duplicates and 117 certified reference materials used; reproducibility within acceptable limits for key elements.
  • Anomaly Scoring: Composite scoring based on 12 geochemical criteria (single‑element thresholds & ratios).
    • 1,222 samples = background (zero or single anomaly).
    • 818 samples = ≥ 2 anomalies; composite scores ranged 2–11.
    • 2 samples achieved the maximum score of 11 (<0.1% of data).
    • 128 samples (6.3%) scored 7 or higher, primarily near the Main showing.
  • Interpretation: High‑scoring anomalies cluster around the Main showing and other trend zones, indicating priority areas for follow‑up exploration.
  • Next Steps: Integration of soil data with existing geological mapping, drilling results, and geophysical surveys; focus on zones where high anomaly scores overlap structural features to define drill targets.
  • Qualified Person: Dr. Jared Suchan, PhD, PGeo, Vice‑President Exploration (NI 43‑101 qualified).

Notable Quotes

“We now have a clear data set that highlights areas of interest around the Main showing. These results give us a strong foundation to build from as we plan the next stage of exploration,” – Paul Sparkes, CEO, Integral Metals Corp.

Read the original news release →

More from Integral Metals Corp